Skip to content

chore(deps): Bump IITM to ^2.0.1#18599

Merged
nicohrubec merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
nh/bump-iitm
Dec 23, 2025
Merged

chore(deps): Bump IITM to ^2.0.1#18599
nicohrubec merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
nh/bump-iitm

Conversation

@nicohrubec
Copy link
Member

@nicohrubec nicohrubec commented Dec 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

IITM has a new patch release with a fix that we need to properly instrument submodule imports in our Otel integrations (for instance to make this work).

Closes #18613

nicohrubec
nicohrubec commented Dec 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
package.json
"cliui/wrap-ansi": "7.0.0",
"sucrase": "getsentry/sucrase#es2020-polyfills"
"sucrase": "getsentry/sucrase#es2020-polyfills",
"import-in-the-middle": "2.0.1"
Copy link
Member Author

@nicohrubec nicohrubec Dec 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need this, else we get two IITM entries in the lock file

Copy link
Member

@chargome chargome Dec 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel this backfire at some point

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

size-limit report 📦

⚠️ Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.

Path Size % Change Change
@sentry/browser 24.82 kB - -
@sentry/browser - with treeshaking flags 23.32 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing) 41.6 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing, Profiling) 46.19 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing, Replay) 80.17 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing, Replay) - with treeshaking flags 69.91 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing, Replay with Canvas) 84.85 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing, Replay, Feedback) 97.1 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Feedback) 41.54 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. sendFeedback) 29.51 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. FeedbackAsync) 34.5 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Metrics) 25.85 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Logs) 26.07 kB - -
@sentry/browser (incl. Metrics & Logs) 26.73 kB - -
@sentry/react 26.54 kB - -
@sentry/react (incl. Tracing) 43.79 kB - -
@sentry/vue 29.29 kB - -
@sentry/vue (incl. Tracing) 43.41 kB - -
@sentry/svelte 24.84 kB - -
CDN Bundle 27.25 kB - -
CDN Bundle (incl. Tracing) 42.24 kB - -
CDN Bundle (incl. Tracing, Replay) 78.96 kB - -
CDN Bundle (incl. Tracing, Replay, Feedback) 84.41 kB - -
CDN Bundle - uncompressed 80.06 kB - -
CDN Bundle (incl. Tracing) - uncompressed 125.49 kB - -
CDN Bundle (incl. Tracing, Replay) - uncompressed 242.03 kB - -
CDN Bundle (incl. Tracing, Replay, Feedback) - uncompressed 254.79 kB - -
@sentry/nextjs (client) 46.02 kB - -
@sentry/sveltekit (client) 41.97 kB - -
@sentry/node-core 51.62 kB +0.02% +8 B 🔺
@sentry/node 161.52 kB +0.01% +4 B 🔺
@sentry/node - without tracing 93.05 kB +0.01% +4 B 🔺
@sentry/aws-serverless 108.57 kB +0.01% +7 B 🔺

View base workflow run

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

node-overhead report 🧳

Note: This is a synthetic benchmark with a minimal express app and does not necessarily reflect the real-world performance impact in an application.
⚠️ Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.

Scenario Requests/s % of Baseline Prev. Requests/s Change %
GET Baseline 9,028 - 11,428 -21%
GET With Sentry 1,717 19% 1,989 -14%
GET With Sentry (error only) 6,203 69% 7,676 -19%
POST Baseline 1,200 - 1,175 +2%
POST With Sentry 593 49% 573 +3%
POST With Sentry (error only) 1,069 89% 1,007 +6%
MYSQL Baseline 3,369 - 3,976 -15%
MYSQL With Sentry 509 15% 525 -3%
MYSQL With Sentry (error only) 2,694 80% 3,241 -17%

View base workflow run

@nicohrubec nicohrubec marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2025 09:51
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2025
Closed
chargome
chargome approved these changes Dec 23, 2025
View reviewed changes
package.json
"cliui/wrap-ansi": "7.0.0",
"sucrase": "getsentry/sucrase#es2020-polyfills"
"sucrase": "getsentry/sucrase#es2020-polyfills",
"import-in-the-middle": "2.0.1"
Copy link
Member

@chargome chargome Dec 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel this backfire at some point

@nicohrubec nicohrubec merged commit 159cb23 into develop Dec 23, 2025
209 checks passed
@nicohrubec nicohrubec deleted the nh/bump-iitm branch December 23, 2025 13:00
@JPeer264
Copy link
Member

JPeer264 commented Dec 23, 2025

I was a little too late. But I post it for future references. Theoretically we don't have to update our package.json since we have a version range anyways. yarn upgrade-interactive import-in-the-middle would do it too, and since yarn is very bad in deduplication you have to follow up with yarn dedupe-deps:fix.

@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2026
Open
@JPeer264 JPeer264 mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2026
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@chargome chargome chargome approved these changes

@isaacs isaacs Awaiting requested review from isaacs

@JPeer264 JPeer264 Awaiting requested review from JPeer264

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

chore(deps): Bump IITM to ^2.0.1

3 participants

@nicohrubec @JPeer264 @chargome