Merged
Conversation
|
|
Codecov ReportBase: 81.41% // Head: 81.41% // No change to project coverage 👍
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #874 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 81.41% 81.41%
=======================================
Files 14 14
Lines 3879 3879
=======================================
Hits 3158 3158
Misses 721 721 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
gkorland
approved these changes
Dec 20, 2022
rafie
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2022
Co-authored-by: Guy Korland <gkorland@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 38bf9fc)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The LGTM service is being shut off in two weeks. This pull request aims to remove all references to LGTM. Perhaps LGTM usage should be replaced with codeql, or a repository preferred tool, but IMHO that's the point of a different pull request.